Now, on to something very different. I don't really know how to talk about the next record, partly because I think I'm going to elicit blasts of derision from everybody I know. It's Tori Amos' Boys for Pele (1996). Obviously this is a truly terrible record. I mean absolutely terrible. However, I think it has an invaluable role because I think Boys for Pele has as much of an influence on Joanna Newsom's last two albums as Joni Mitchell and Kate Bush. In fact I don't think the world would have been nearly as ready to accept Ys and Have One On Me if Boys for Pele had never been made. Honestly, it's all here - the songs that seem formless and then grow almost out of themselves, the lyrical obfuscation, the ceaseless riffing off Kate Bush, even some of the melodic phrasing that Newsom uses is set out here. The key difference is that when Amos does this stuff it comes out sounding awful and when Newsom does it, it comes out sounding utterly sublime.
On to more lively things with the sole album by Kim Deal's Breeders-hiatus band The Amps called Pacer (1995). After the Breeders call it quits following the success of Last Splash, Deal formed the Amps to fill in time while sister Kelley got through the heroin cold turkey, and to be honest, as many people would agree, she works better without Kelley hanging around. Pacer is a great album, lo-fi indie rock, that sounds unmistakably like the work of its writer. There's a lot more life and sense of fun to Pacer than Last Splash and the whole album sounds like a weight has been lifted off her shoulders. It's brisk and spiky, and doesn't hang around. Then we've got the 'Tipp City' single, which has a great B-side in 75-second 'Just Like a Briar'.

Next up should be Les Filles Compliquees (1991) by French singer Elisabeth Anais. I bought the tape of this when I was on holiday with my mum and dad and thought that she looked super-cute (Elisabeth Anais, not my mum). I haven't heard it for some years and it has no internet visibility so we'll have to skip it.
Now on to something extremely serious. Well, if not entirely serious then certainly intellectually weighty. It's a couple of albums from each end of Laurie Anderson's career, starting with Big Science (1982). Apparently the New York art community were aghast at Anderson, an established visual artist, releasing a pop record. In retrospect this seems fairly extraordinary bearing in mind how little it would surprise or upset anybody these days. I mean when Turner Prize winner Steve McQueen is making movies about sex addicts for a major film studio, there's not much left to be aghast by in the art world is there? Anyway, it really only serves to prove how ahead of her time Anderson has always been. Big Science is about as far away from a pop record that a pop record could ever get. It is instead a kind of musical treatise on how not to live our lives, a deeply satirical and laconic report from a sort of psychic distance. There is something peculiarly separate about Anderson's records, as if she can see straight through the world and people and their behaviour, but she's reporting what she sees from behind a thick pane of glass. It's even more the case with her last album, Homeland (2010), which is a quite spectacular record, unnerving, disturbing, laugh-out-loud funny and musically quite unbelievable. Again, it seems as if unravelling the world is all too easy, the difficulty is how to report it back. There are many references, some overt, some coded, to the immense stupidity of people and their relationship to the world, but she is never pompous or arrogant, smug or sanctimonious, she clearly includes herself in her analyses. She shouldn't, she's much smarter than the rest of us.
Finally for today it's a bit of modern classical with Timothy Andres' Shy & Mighty (2010). It's a terrible name and it's got a terrible cover (with the pianist himself looking like a failed catalogue ad model trying to look "laid back"). But the record is very different to what one would expect from the outside. It's a relatively generic take on dissonant solo piano, but the fact that it doesn't have the strength of its own conviction to really give it large John Cage style is absolutely to its benefit, because in amongst the tumbling notes and the unpredictable volume shifts are some really lovely melodic lines. There's not much here that to be honest even someone like Rachel Grimes hasn't done before and better, but it does have enough to keep me listening.
And so ends yet another day. Yet another exactly the same day. See you on the other side for another one. Exactly the same. But with a slightly different soundtrack. SEE YA!
No comments:
Post a Comment